Report an error
Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average length of Extra History YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Bosnia and Herzegovina | r=0.95 | 9yrs | No |
The number of computer network architects in Kansas | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Mozambique | r=0.89 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington | r=0.89 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Transportation | r=0.87 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of social workers in Oregon | r=0.86 | 16yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Mr. Beast' | r=0.82 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Brazil | r=0.78 | 15yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in Saint Vincent/Grenadines | r=0.76 | 15yrs | No |
Average views of Matt Parker's YouTube videos | r=0.75 | 12yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on processed vegetables | r=0.74 | 16yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Zendaya appeared in | r=0.74 | 12yrs | No |
Air quality in Kahului, Hawaii | r=0.73 | 16yrs | No |
Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota | r=0.63 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)