Report an error
US production of cottage cheese correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Georgia | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nicolas | r=0.93 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Adolfo | r=0.93 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Isabel | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jesus | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Greece | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
Robberies in Virginia | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Czechia | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Abby | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Angel | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
Electricity generation in United Kingdom | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
Robberies in the US | r=0.87 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Vicky | r=0.87 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nick | r=0.84 | 22yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' | r=0.6 | 18yrs | No |
US production of cottage cheese also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)