Report an error
US production of sour cream correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Inflation in the US | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in Japan | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
| Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Violet | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'ice bath' | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Afghanistan | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
| Air quality in Boston | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Noah | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.88 | 22yrs | No |
| Votes for Libertarian Senators in Delaware | r=0.79 | 6yrs | No |
US production of sour cream also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)