Report an error
Magnitude 7.0-7.9 Earthquakes in the US correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How professional-sounding minutephysics YouTube video titles are | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in interdisciplinary studies | r=0.73 | 9yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about physics | r=0.73 | 14yrs | No |
England's performance in Cricket World Cups | r=0.66 | 11yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.5 | 20yrs | No |
The distance between Mars and the Sun | r=-0.57 | 20yrs | No |
The distance between Mars and Earth | r=-0.6 | 20yrs | No |
The distance between Mars and Mercury | r=-0.68 | 20yrs | No |
Magnitude 7.0-7.9 Earthquakes in the US also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)