Report an error
US production of yogurt, nonfrozen correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
GMO use in corn | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jude | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Lucy | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
The number of accountants and auditors in Massachusetts | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Indiana | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Parker | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Carter | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
Total number of live births in Australia | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
GMO use in soybeans | r=0.88 | 22yrs | No |
GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota | r=0.83 | 22yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.82 | 22yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Philadelphia Eagles | r=0.8 | 22yrs | No |
US production of yogurt, nonfrozen also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)