Report an error
Milk-fat consumption correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Biomass power generated in Cambodia | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
The number of hotel managers in Washington | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals' stock price (VRTX) | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
Average SAT score in math | r=0.78 | 32yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Michigan | r=0.76 | 8yrs | No |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Tires | r=0.71 | 32yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.67 | 32yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is donald trump' | r=0.67 | 18yrs | No |
Hot days in Sydney | r=0.56 | 32yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Green Bay Packers | r=0.55 | 32yrs | No |
Milk-fat consumption also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)