Report an error
Sherbet consumption correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Alex | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Brooke | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Mario | r=0.95 | 32yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Victor | r=0.94 | 32yrs | No |
| Robberies in Arizona | r=0.93 | 32yrs | No |
| Robberies in Virginia | r=0.91 | 32yrs | No |
| Arson in Iowa | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
| Global Per Capita Rice Consumption | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Trevor | r=0.9 | 32yrs | No |
| Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.89 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.86 | 14yrs | No |
| Motor vehicle thefts in Tennessee | r=0.78 | 32yrs | No |
| Arson in Alaska | r=0.75 | 32yrs | No |
Sherbet consumption also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)