Report an error
Consumption of dry buttermilk products correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'what does the fox say' meme | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Patents granted to General Electric | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos | r=0.77 | 9yrs | No |
Air quality in Riverton, Wyoming | r=0.68 | 32yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Costco | r=0.58 | 22yrs | No |
Google searches for 'zombies' | r=0.56 | 18yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Congo-Kinshasa | r=0.46 | 32yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cia hotline' | r=-0.61 | 18yrs | No |
Consumption of dry buttermilk products also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)