Report an error
The number of telemarketers in California correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Cindy | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Joseph | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Timothy | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Abby | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Anna | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kody | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alicia | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Michael | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Emily | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jesus | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Anthony | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Tamia | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Gregorio | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Dan | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Carina | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
Air pollution in Visalia, California | r=0.89 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The number of telemarketers in California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)