Report an error
The number of marketing managers in California correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Microsoft's stock price (MSFT) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Average views of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is elon musk' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
The number of marketing managers in California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)