Report an error
Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Visitors to Disney Worlds Magic Kingdom | r=0.78 | 15yrs | No |
Visitors to Disneyland | r=0.77 | 15yrs | No |
How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are | r=0.77 | 7yrs | No |
The number of cooks, short order in New York | r=0.68 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Total annual cinema attendance in the UK | r=0.66 | 22yrs | Yes! |
The number of automotive body repairers in New Mexico | r=0.65 | 20yrs | No |
Air quality in Crescent City, California | r=0.62 | 36yrs | No |
The number of bartenders in Indiana | r=0.59 | 20yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Pennsylvania | r=0.58 | 23yrs | No |
Mega millions lottery numbers | r=0.54 | 21yrs | No |
The marriage rate in New Mexico | r=0.52 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Massachusetts | r=0.5 | 23yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Denmark | r=0.5 | 43yrs | No |
How trendy CGP Grey YouTube video titles are | r=0.48 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'n95 mask' | r=-0.74 | 19yrs | No |
Average length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos | r=-0.92 | 9yrs | No |
Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)