Report an error
Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How geeky PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are | r=0.86 | 7yrs | No |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Taylor Swift | r=0.61 | 16yrs | No |
The number of movies Michael B. Jordan appeared in | r=0.56 | 23yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Nicaragua | r=0.56 | 22yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Eritrea | r=0.55 | 25yrs | Yes! |
Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released | r=0.5 | 24yrs | Yes! |
England Football Team's International Match Count | r=0.47 | 47yrs | No |
Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)