Report an error
Number of competing nations in the Summer Olympics correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Republican Senators in Louisiana | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
The wind speed in Jacksonville | r=0.96 | 8yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Florida | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
Average temperature in Las Vegas | r=0.81 | 13yrs | No |
Average views of Matt Parker's YouTube videos | r=0.78 | 11yrs | No |
Nielsen Ranking of Smallville Season Finale | r=0.71 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to build a bunker' | r=0.56 | 18yrs | No |
The distance between the moon and Earth | r=0.48 | 46yrs | No |
Freezing temperatures in Albuquerque | r=-0.93 | 13yrs | No |
Number of competing nations in the Summer Olympics also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)