Report an error
Australia's Per Capita GDP correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of first-line supervisors of police and detectives in Utah | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Library science | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in information sciences | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
The price of gold | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
The number of funeral attendants in South Carolina | r=0.84 | 14yrs | No |
The number of zoologists in Nevada | r=0.83 | 13yrs | No |
Total length of Vihart's YouTube videos | r=0.81 | 14yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.77 | 13yrs | No |
Global plane crashes | r=0.75 | 14yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Australia | r=0.62 | 13yrs | No |
Australia's Per Capita GDP also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)