Report an error
The number of lawyers in Arizona correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Apple's annual net income | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'red pill blue pill' meme | r=0.94 | 17yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Spain | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to hide a body' | r=0.88 | 19yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Tunisia | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
The number of lawyers in Arizona also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)