Report an error
Number of Automotive Franchise Establishments in the US correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Runs scored by the Pittsburgh Pirates | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
General Electric's stock price (GE) | r=0.96 | 8yrs | No |
AT&T Inc.'s stock price (T) | r=0.96 | 8yrs | No |
Worldwide revenue from Harley Davidson motorcycles | r=0.94 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Clint Eastwood appeared in | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
The number of sound engineering technicians in California | r=0.87 | 8yrs | No |
Number of Automotive Franchise Establishments in the US also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)