Report an error
Global Per Capita Rice Consumption correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Sherbet consumption | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in France | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
The number of legislators in Alaska | r=0.88 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Gulfport, Mississippi | r=0.83 | 9yrs | Yes! |
The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania | r=0.8 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Republican Senators in Maine | r=0.72 | 7yrs | No |
Global Per Capita Rice Consumption also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)