Report an error
Global revenue of Samsonite correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of websites on the internet | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
Amazon's Annual Outbound Shipping Expenditure in Millions | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in India | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Lithuania | r=0.94 | 16yrs | No |
Global revenue of Samsonite also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)