Report an error
Number of World of Warcraft Subscribers correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How insightful LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.96 | 8yrs | No |
Air quality in Bucyrus, Ohio | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
Air quality in Cleveland, Tennessee | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
The number of college psychology teachers in Kansas | r=0.88 | 18yrs | No |
The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois | r=0.88 | 18yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Syria | r=0.85 | 17yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Jordan | r=0.84 | 17yrs | No |
GMO use in corn | r=0.83 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'download firefox' | r=0.81 | 18yrs | No |
The divorce rate in South Dakota | r=0.81 | 17yrs | No |
Arson in Maine | r=0.8 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rashad | r=0.8 | 18yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Uganda | r=0.79 | 17yrs | No |
Number of seasons Manchester United won matches | r=0.78 | 18yrs | No |
Kobe Bryant's Regular Season Points | r=0.77 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'call of duty' | r=0.77 | 18yrs | No |
The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama | r=0.58 | 16yrs | No |
Rain in Berlin | r=0.49 | 17yrs | No |
Number of World of Warcraft Subscribers also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)