Report an error
Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Jet fuel used globally | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Saudi Arabia | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in South Korea | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Rwanda | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Peru | r=0.87 | 20yrs | No |
The number of dishwashers in California | r=0.86 | 20yrs | Yes! |
US kids in public school | r=0.85 | 21yrs | Yes! |
The number of waiters and waitresses in Georgia | r=0.85 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Number of websites on the internet | r=0.84 | 17yrs | No |
The price of gold | r=0.83 | 13yrs | No |
Tornados in Oklahoma | r=0.58 | 21yrs | No |
Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)