Report an error
Canadian Carbon Dioxide Emissions correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Central African Republic | r=0.93 | 8yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Washington | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
The number of machinists in Michigan | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Canada | r=0.81 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Reagan | r=0.81 | 22yrs | No |
The number of dietitians and nutritionists in Puerto Rico | r=0.8 | 19yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.67 | 22yrs | No |
Canadian Carbon Dioxide Emissions also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)