Report an error
Ticket sales for New York Yankees games correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 't-rex' | r=0.93 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Isabelle | r=0.92 | 45yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jack | r=0.91 | 45yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Spain | r=0.91 | 40yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Adrian | r=0.89 | 45yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jaden | r=0.88 | 44yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 9th grade | r=0.88 | 30yrs | Yes! |
Kobe Bryant's total free throw count in NBA regular season | r=0.71 | 18yrs | No |
The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in | r=0.51 | 45yrs | No |
Ticket sales for New York Yankees games also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)