Report an error
Ticket sales for Houston Astros games correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Engineering | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
Instructor salaries in the US | r=0.96 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Annual book sales in the US | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
The number of wastewater treatment plant operators in Texas | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Honduras | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
University Lecturer salaries in the US | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.68 | 37yrs | No |
Ticket sales for Houston Astros games also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)