Report an error
Ticket sales for Chicago Cubs games correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How clickbait-y Deep Look YouTube video titles are | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Hugo | r=0.88 | 45yrs | No |
Nuclear power generation in France | r=0.88 | 40yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jack | r=0.85 | 45yrs | No |
Number of highschoolers in the US | r=0.85 | 30yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.8 | 41yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Mars | r=0.61 | 45yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.59 | 40yrs | No |
Ticket sales for Chicago Cubs games also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)