Report an error
Runs scored by the Atlanta Braves correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
UK Music Album Sales | r=0.86 | 14yrs | No |
Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) | r=0.74 | 48yrs | No |
Home Run Count for the Texas Rangers Team | r=0.7 | 48yrs | No |
New York Yankees' victories | r=0.67 | 48yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Austria | r=0.5 | 43yrs | No |
Runs scored by the Atlanta Braves also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)