Report an error
Wins for the Chicago Cubs correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Assistant Processor salaries in the US | r=0.86 | 13yrs | No |
Professor salaries in the US | r=0.85 | 13yrs | No |
Associate Professor salaries in the US | r=0.82 | 13yrs | No |
Global iPod Sales | r=0.7 | 9yrs | No |
Wins for the Chicago Cubs also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)