Report an error
Popularity of the first name Waylon correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Church & Dwight Co.'s stock price (CHD) | r=1 | 21yrs | No |
Wind power generated in China | r=1 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Starbucks' stock price (SBUX) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Solar power generated in United States | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.98 | 33yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Burundi | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is alexa' | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Waylon also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)