Report an error
Popularity of the first name Adeline correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Global sales revenue of elevators and escalators | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.97 | 37yrs | No |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags | r=0.95 | 33yrs | No |
Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM) | r=0.93 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in North Carolina | r=0.92 | 11yrs | Yes! |
The price of gold | r=0.9 | 40yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is donald trump' | r=0.8 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Adeline also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)