Report an error
Popularity of the first name Annabel correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Yemen | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in North Carolina | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Massachusetts | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in California | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in New York | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Maryland | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Michigan | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 2nd grade | r=0.81 | 33yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' | r=0.7 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Annabel also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)