Report an error
Crocodile Attacks in South-East Asia & Australia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How provocative Vihart's YouTube video titles are | r=0.92 | 6yrs | No |
University Lecturer salaries in the US | r=0.91 | 6yrs | No |
Professor salaries in the US | r=0.9 | 6yrs | No |
The number of umpires and referees in Massachusetts | r=0.88 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Associate Professor salaries in the US | r=0.85 | 6yrs | No |
Lebron James' Regular Season Point Total | r=0.78 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'its wednesday my dudes' meme | r=0.76 | 9yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about physics | r=0.74 | 8yrs | No |
The number of agricultural inspectors in Indiana | r=0.73 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'spiderman pointing' meme | r=0.62 | 9yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.58 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Menachem | r=0.53 | 14yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme | r=0.51 | 9yrs | No |
Crocodile Attacks in South-East Asia & Australia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)