Report an error
Amount spent on Pet Gifts on Valentine's Day in the US correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air pollution in Madera, California | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Brazil | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'black hole photo' | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Ford Motor Company's stock price (F) | r=0.94 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself' | r=0.93 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Vincent | r=0.93 | 9yrs | No |
US household spending on fresh fruits | r=0.92 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i am tired' | r=0.9 | 9yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Wyoming | r=0.9 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'best place to work' | r=0.9 | 9yrs | No |
Season wins for the Detroit Lions | r=0.87 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.87 | 9yrs | No |
Air quality in Salt Lake City, Utah | r=0.86 | 9yrs | No |
The number of lawyers in Washington | r=0.85 | 9yrs | No |
The number of outdoor power equipment mechanics in Delaware | r=0.83 | 9yrs | No |
The number of movies Chris Evans appeared in | r=0.73 | 9yrs | No |
Amount spent on Pet Gifts on Valentine's Day in the US also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)