Report an error
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts store count in the US correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Votes for Republican Senators in Michigan | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in Tennessee | r=0.96 | 6yrs | Yes! |
| Hot days in Paris | r=0.93 | 9yrs | No |
| The number of middle school teachers in Maine | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No |
| Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa | r=0.85 | 6yrs | Yes! |
| The number of cement masons and concrete finishers in Michigan | r=0.82 | 19yrs | No |
| Divorce rates in the United Kingdom | r=0.72 | 12yrs | No |
| Total views on Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.71 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.67 | 14yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'who is alexa' | r=0.66 | 15yrs | No |
| The number of vending machine repairers in New Hampshire | r=0.65 | 17yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'spiderman pointing' meme | r=0.63 | 16yrs | No |
| Total comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos | r=0.59 | 15yrs | Yes! |
| Total likes of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos | r=0.51 | 15yrs | Yes! |
| Biomass power generated in Sierra Leone | r=-0.99 | 8yrs | No |
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts store count in the US also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)