Report an error
Popularity of the first name Rex correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Jet fuel used in Samoa | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
Wind power generated in New Zealand | r=0.97 | 30yrs | No |
Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.96 | 24yrs | No |
UK Service Retail Price Index | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'headache remedies' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i cant even' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
Italian-type cheese consumption | r=0.92 | 27yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Southwest Airlines | r=0.82 | 28yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Missoula, Montana | r=0.81 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Rex also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)