Report an error
Popularity of the first name Teddy correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
| Microsoft's stock price (MSFT) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Eli Lilly and Company's stock price (LLY) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Micron Technology's stock price (MU) | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
| ON Semiconductor's stock price (ON) | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
| Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
| Annual U.S. inflation rate | r=0.63 | 33yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Teddy also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)