NOTICE: This variable is inactive
The correlation is not active in any lists.
This page remains only to prevent link rot.
Report an error
Total MLB League Revenue correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Air pollution in Houghton, Michigan | r=1 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Air pollution in Des Moines | r=1 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' | r=0.99 | 18yrs | Yes! |
| Arson in Florida | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'n95 mask' | r=0.97 | 17yrs | No |
| Runs scored by the Minnesota Twins | r=-0.82 | 21yrs | No |
Total MLB League Revenue also correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Sys. Score |
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)