Report an error
Ticket prices at North American movie theaters correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Chile | r=0.99 | 9yrs | No |
Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Camila | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Somalia | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Croatia | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of lawyers in California | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Russia | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Italian-type cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Morocco | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on pets, toys, and hobbies | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Israel | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
US production of butter | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.95 | 22yrs | Yes! |
The number of postsecondary art, drama, and music teachers in Texas | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.74 | 22yrs | No |
Ticket prices at North American movie theaters also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)