Report an error
Popularity of the first name Emerson correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of customer service representatives in North Carolina | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
The number of fashion designers in California | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Total views on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
The number of registered nurses in Alabama | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
The number of salespeople in Texas | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
The number of security guards in Texas | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Number of Walmart stores worldwide | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
The number of veterinary technologists and technicians in Florida | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Total Revenue of the NFL Teams | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
China's Annual Passenger Car Production | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'drake' meme | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
The number of insurance claims adjusters in Alabama | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
The average number of likes on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
CVS stock price (CVS) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Emerson also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)