Report an error
Popularity of the first name Valentin correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
How cool LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.87 | 48yrs | No |
Budget for largest movie production | r=0.86 | 47yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.84 | 43yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Mississippi | r=0.79 | 15yrs | No |
UFO sightings in California | r=0.78 | 47yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Tennessee | r=0.74 | 16yrs | No |
Gasoline Prices in the US | r=0.73 | 33yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Detroit Lions | r=0.7 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Valentin also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)