Report an error
Popularity of the first name Sunny correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Salesforce's stock price (CRM) | r=0.99 | 18yrs | Yes! |
| Republic Services' stock price (RSG) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Total solar power generated globally | r=0.97 | 39yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in China | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
| Walmart's stock price (WMT) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Egypt | r=0.92 | 39yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Sunny also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)