Report an error
Popularity of the first name Josh correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Arson in Iowa | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
| Arson in Idaho | r=0.93 | 22yrs | No |
| US Motorcycle Manufacturing Industry Revenue | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
| US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.9 | 14yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in France | r=0.86 | 48yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'shook' | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in Croatia | r=0.84 | 30yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in Norway | r=0.77 | 43yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in Sweden | r=0.75 | 43yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Omaha | r=0.66 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Josh also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)