Report an error
Popularity of the first name Ashtyn correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.97 | 30yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Saturn | r=0.97 | 39yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Bermuda | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Bermuda | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in United States | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
Electricity generation in American Samoa | r=0.94 | 38yrs | No |
Air pollution in Logan, Utah | r=0.89 | 39yrs | No |
US kids in public school | r=0.86 | 33yrs | No |
UFO sightings in North Dakota | r=0.82 | 38yrs | No |
Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States | r=0.71 | 32yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ashtyn also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)