Report an error
Popularity of the first name Kodi correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| ICON PLC's stock price (ICLR) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Nasdaq's stock price (NDAQ) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Gartner's stock price (IT) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| The Charles Schwab Corporation's stock price (SCHW) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Extra Space Storage's stock price (EXR) | r=0.96 | 18yrs | Yes! |
| NVIDIA's stock price (NVDA) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
| Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.89 | 12yrs | No |
| Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire | r=0.8 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| The number of movies Denzel Washington appeared in | r=0.53 | 46yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kodi also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)