Report an error
Popularity of the first name Lana correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Kerosene used in Falkland Islands | r=0.96 | 26yrs | No |
Total likes of LEMMiNO YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Inflation in the US | r=0.87 | 31yrs | No |
US milk fat used to produce sour cream | r=0.87 | 22yrs | No |
Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.86 | 32yrs | No |
The number of hotel managers in Maine | r=0.79 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Lana also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)