Report an error
Number of home runs hit by Matt Kemp correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of preschool special education teachers in Missouri | r=0.94 | 9yrs | Yes! |
The number of school teachers in Maryland | r=0.9 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Riverside, California | r=0.84 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.82 | 7yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Egypt | r=0.78 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Los Angeles | r=0.72 | 15yrs | No |
Season wins for the Atlanta Falcons | r=0.65 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Zdeno Chara's Seasonal Total Goal Assists | r=0.62 | 15yrs | No |
Domino's Pizza Group's Earnings per Share | r=0.61 | 15yrs | No |
Number of home runs hit by Matt Kemp also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)