Report an error
Popularity of the first name Tobias correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Fossil fuel use in Sudan | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Google searches for 'smol' | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Annual Revenue of Walt Disney Company | r=0.92 | 32yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.91 | 46yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is donald trump' | r=0.79 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Tobias also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)