Report an error
Popularity of the first name Julien correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Electricity generation in Cyprus | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in Grenada | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in The Bahamas | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Taiwan | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
| Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Connecticut | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.93 | 32yrs | No |
| US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
| Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.93 | 34yrs | No |
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.86 | 32yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Julien also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)