Report an error
Total Number of Gareth Bale's Club Football Matches correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Worldwide Harry Potter Movies Revenue | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
The number of first-line retail sales supervisors in Arkansas | r=0.84 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Jet fuel used in Namibia | r=0.74 | 16yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Uruguay | r=0.74 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Automotive recalls issued by Honda | r=0.68 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=0.67 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'facebook' | r=0.61 | 17yrs | No |
Total Number of Gareth Bale's Club Football Matches also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)