Report an error
Popularity of the first name Tatum correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Colorado | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
QUALCOMM's stock price (QCOM) | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Minnesota | r=0.91 | 12yrs | Yes! |
The number of commercial pilots in Alaska | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
The number of fashion designers in Texas | r=0.77 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Tatum also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)