Report an error
Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of labor relations specialists in Tennessee | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Biomass power generated in Hungary | r=0.92 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The number of tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents in Wisconsin | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
Air quality in Las Vegas, Nevada | r=0.86 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Ava | r=0.83 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Turkmenistan | r=0.82 | 20yrs | Yes! |
GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota | r=0.81 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)