Report an error
Popularity of the first name Octavia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Take-Two Interactive Software's stock price (TTWO) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Nicaragua | r=0.96 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Activision Blizzard's stock price (ATVI) | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for '3Blue1Brown' | r=0.92 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Octavia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)